
The NCAA has recently adopted a new measure of academic performance known as the academic progress rate or APR. When the rankings were released last year, there was a major surprise among Division 1-A schools. Sitting in number 4, tops among public universities was the none other than Auburn University, known more for NCAA probation than academic performance. Nevertheless, there it was, nestled tightly behind Stanford, Navy, Boston College and just ahead of Duke. Do you think people were surprised?
It appears that a major contributing factor to Auburn's high APR score may well have been judicious management of football player's academic careers. According to
today's New York Times, it seems that there was at least one sociology professor who systematically gave football players and other athletes high grades for courses that required little no work and no attendance. This professor, the interim chairman of the department no less, taught what was known as directed reading courses, resemebled independent study. Normally such courses were not used for basic core subjects, but exceptions were made in the case of athletes.
At one point, in the spring of 2005, Professor Petee, the interim chairman of the sociology department, taught 152 directed reading courses in addition to his regular courses and his administrative duties. A significant number of these were athletes. Other professors at Auburn indicated that significantly less than 10 directed reading courses a semester would be the norm. The content of the courses was also questioned as the workload was considered to be significantly lighter than expected for a comparable course.
Auburn has begun an investigation and promised an open result. Auburn is always under investigation so this is nothing new for them. I'm not terribly surprised by this as athletics has long ruled the roost at Auburn. After all, it was only a couple of years that its accreditation was in jeopardy for trustee involvement in the running of the athletics and administration of the university. Clearly, nothing has been learned from that incident.
Additional articles on the subject can be found
here and
here.UPDATE: James Gundlach, the Auburn sociology professor whose complaints to Pete Thamel led to the Times story has
decided to quit cooperating with Auburn investigation into his allegations. He made his decision after reading in the Huntsville Times that the administration said he was motivated, in part, by being passed over for department chairman by the man at the center of the controversy. Gundlach denies ever being a candidate for chairman, much less being passed over and says he only told administration officials that he did not support Petee when ran for chairman. Check the Huntsville Times article for more on Gundlach's story.