Since the lockout began, one NHL team has been sold, an agreement has been reached to sell another and one has been placed on the auction block. What is most curious to me about this fact is what little impact the lockout seems to have played in each of these sales. Let's examine the three situations individually and you will see what I mean and what this may bode for the future of hockey.
The first sale was of the Mighty Ducks from the Disney Company to Henry and Susan Samueli, the owners of the operating lease of the Pond at Anaheim. In this case, Disney got out of the sports business, having also divested themselves of the Anaheim Angels of Los Angeles, Southern California, Orange County and all other points north of San Diego. The Samuelis decided to purchase the team mostly as they wanted to control the only tenant of their building. Their real interest is in buying and moving an NBA team to Anaheim, probably either the Clippers or the Kings. So, consider this sale a real estate play not a vote of confidence in either hockey or Gary Bettman. Basically, they didn't want anyone else to be making the decisions that would determine the course of action that would so greatly impact the arena.
The next sale is the Penguins, where an agreement has been reached by a local group led by Mario Lemiuex to sell the club to a group of investors led by a Silicon Valley venture capitalist, William Del Biaggio, a friend of Lemiuex who would retain a minority interest. This deal is also in most respects a real estate deal. Lemiuex has been so far unsuccessful in obtaining a new arena for the Penguins and any talk of moving the franchise while he is the owner rings hollow. So the solution he has cooked up is to sell the club to someone who come to town, professing his strong desire to keep the team in Pittsburgh but loudly proclaims to one and all that the team will only stay if it gets a new arena. We'll see how this plays out but the Governor has already said that no state money is available for a new arena.
Finally, the potential of the St. Louis Blues was recently announced. Here, the Lauries, the owners of the team and the arena in which the Blues play blamed the financial losses they have suffered as the reason for selling. Since the losses were upwards of $200 million, that seems a plausible reason. A closer examination may reveal yet another possible real estate play at work here. As part of the St. Louis Cardinals new stadium construction, the Cardinals received an exemption from state tax and from the city's five percent entertainment tax. The Lauries had asked for a similar exemption from the city and had been denied. The announcement that the team and the Savvis Center are for sale could be a negotiating ploy as much as a bona fide effort to sell the team. We won't know for sure until a buyer steps forward and closes the sale.
What is striking about all three case is that in each case, the sale is all about the real estate. These sales have far more to do with arenas than with hockey teams. In Anaheim, it was done to protect an arena. In Pittsburgh, it's being done to get an arena. In St. Louis, it may be a negotiating ploy over taxes related to arenas. Is hockey such an insignificant business proposition that the hockey aspect of these deals are now just throw-ins? If that is the case, then the effects of the lockout may be more far reaching than anyone ever thought.